- First, before you get to what you want to say with your answer, show that you have heard and understood what your questioner has had to say. In Hendrix’s system, you precisely mirror what your questioner has said. “I heard you say….” Why mirror as closely as you can what your questioner has just said? Because it is the first step to having them feel that they have been heard, really heard, by you.
- Then, just as important, validate what you’ve heard: “What you say makes sense.” “I appreciate what you are saying…”; “I understand why you’d ask….” In that way you demonstrate your ability to see that what your questioner has said is real, legitimate, and valid for them.
- Third, find and express the common ground between the two of you: “We have very similar concerns about…”; “We think, too, people ought to know about….” Finding and declaring the common ground makes it possible, now, for you to be heard when you answer the question that has actually been asked.
And we do believe that, in this situation, you do answer the question that you’ve been asked (which makes the speech Q&A different from some forms of media training). We like the four-part answer format:
- State your answer in language and terms familiar to your audience.
- Give the reason for your answer; it should be fact-based and grounded in values that make sense for the audience.
- Provide a concrete example.
- End with a summary of your answer.
Whether you will win arguments with this approach is an open – and in some ways a “beside the point” – question. You will win friends. And you just may win an unlooked for ally.